Retaliation

‘Serious Health Conditions’ Under the FMLA and What It Takes to Prove that a Worker Does (or Does Not) Have One

October 31, 2025 | Parks, Chesin & Walbert

In FMLA matters, things that may seem self-evident are not always so. For example, as a recent federal appeals case demonstrated, even if an employer granted FMLA leave to an employee, that employee may not necessarily have been entitled to the leave. If they were not, then they cannot pursue a case of retaliation or interference. If you have questions about entitlement to FMLA leave or the required elements of a retaliation or interference case, be sure to get knowledgeable answers by talking to an experienced Atlanta FMLA lawyer.

L.H., the employee, worked as an investigator for a university in Texas, tasked with “investigating allegations of harassment, discrimination, sexual misconduct and retaliation.” Due to mental health issues, the investigator requested FMLA leave from February 17, 2023, to May 1, 2023. On the day the investigator returned to work, her supervisor and the university’s head of HR met with her to tell her that the university was terminating her employment.

The investigator subsequently sued for interference with FMLA rights and retaliation. According to the investigator, the university fired her in retaliation for taking leave. According to the university, it fired the investigator due to performance problems it discovered while she was on leave.

The Importance of Satisfying the Proper ‘Causation’ Standard in an FMLA Retaliation Case

October 17, 2025 | Parks, Chesin & Walbert

Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) retaliation litigation serves an essential purpose by providing recourse to workers who were unfairly subjected to adverse employment actions for engaging in protected activities, such as requesting or taking FMLA leave. Whether you are an employee who has encountered this type of mistreatment or you are an employer who has taken an adverse action against an employee for a perfectly valid and legitimate reason, it is crucial to understand how to proceed properly in an FMLA retaliation action. That includes retaining an experienced Atlanta FMLA retaliation lawyer who can help you navigate the procedural details and legal nuances of this area of the law.

One of the most essential parts of any FMLA retaliation case is causation—the assessment of whether an employee’s protected FMLA activities caused their employer to punish them. Proving or disproving causation can be vital to the success of your case, and the standard for causation can vary based on where you litigate, as a recent retaliation case shows.

D. D.-S., the employee, worked for a local government in Louisiana from 2008 to 2020. In November 2019, she took a week of sick leave. Immediately after that, she requested FMLA leave to care for her ailing husband. The employee’s 12 weeks of FMLA leave expired in late February, and the employer declined to offer an extension.

How an Employer’s Refusal to Rehire a Former Employee May Constitute FMLA Retaliation

September 24, 2025 | Parks, Chesin & Walbert

A lumber mill worker’s recent success in federal court represents a noteworthy outcome for multiple reasons. For the worker, it recognizes that an employer may be liable for retaliation under the Family and Medical Leave Act, both by terminating the worker and by subsequently refusing to rehire them. On the employer side, it demonstrates just how crucial it is to document carefully why your business makes the decisions it does regarding hiring, firing, and rehiring, and how this is even more critical if your business is dealing with a worker who has engaged in statutorily protected activities in the past. Whether you are a worker or an employer, an experienced Atlanta FMLA retaliation lawyer can provide essential answers to questions you have about this issue.

The worker, E.B., worked for two years, from 2015 to 2017. According to the employee’s lawsuit, he “worked in every department … without complaint or discipline.” The employer allegedly fired him in December 2017 after he requested and took FMLA leave to care for his disabled wife.

E.B. sued for FMLA retaliation in 2019. K.B., a coworker at the mill, submitted a sworn statement in support of E.B. as part of that lawsuit.

What Does (and Does Not) Make a Workplace Complaint a ‘Protected Activity’ Under Title VII Retaliation Law

September 10, 2025 | Parks, Chesin & Walbert

Here in Georgia, workers who experience discrimination based on specific statutorily defined characteristics, like, for example, age and sexual orientation, are protected by federal law. If you are a worker who has experienced this kind of discrimination at work (or are an employer facing such an allegation), it pays to retain an experienced Atlanta employment discrimination lawyer to handle your case. The law requires a worker to clear certain legal hurdles if his case is to defeat employer motions (like a motion to dismiss or motion for summary judgment). A skilled advocate can be instrumental in ensuring that your pleadings are in order, whether you are the worker or the employer.

A recent workplace discrimination case from southwest Georgia illustrates the risks that a worker assumes when proceeding without counsel.

B.H., the employee, worked as a career development coordinator at a public university in Albany, Georgia. The coordinator was 40 years old, gay, and Black, and his “protected characteristics” allegedly placed a discriminatory target on him.

Employer Termination Decisions, Employee Invocation of FMLA Rights, and the Importance of Timing in Interference and Retaliation Cases

August 29, 2025 | Parks, Chesin & Walbert

Employers must tread carefully when disciplining (or firing) workers who have sought to invoke their Family and Medical Leave Act rights. Employers may be vulnerable to liability for FMLA interference or retaliation if they cannot demonstrate that the employee’s exercise of FMLA played no role in the decision-making that yielded the adverse action. On the other hand, employers who have clear evidence that FMLA was not a factor (such as an employer that made an internal decision to punish or fire a worker before the employee requested FMLA leave) need not fear proceeding with their intended adverse action. Whether you are an employer or an employee, the keys often lie with carefully documenting everything and promptly retaining a skilled Atlanta FMLA lawyer.

An FMLA case from here in Metro Atlanta is a good illustration.

The employer was an Alpharetta-based business marketing firm. The employee was one of its project managers. About five years into her tenure, the project manager’s new supervisor placed her on a Performance Improvement Plan (which is a type of formal discipline that establishes a deadline for an employee to improve deficiencies in their work).

Scenarios Where Employers May Fire or Demote Workers Who Are Taking FMLA Leave

August 18, 2025 | Parks, Chesin & Walbert

The Family and Medical Leave Act provides strong protections for workers who need leave. These include things like being reinstated to the same or a similar position after returning from leave. As with most legal concepts, this protection is not absolute. The law carves out exceptions, such as when the employer has evidence that it would have demoted or fired the worker even if they had never gone on FMLA leave. Whether you are a worker or an employer, you should talk to an experienced Atlanta FMLA lawyer if you have questions.

An FMLA case from nearby Douglas County shows how this concept works and how an employer can use it successfully.

E.P., the employee, was a deputy chief with the county fire department. Soon after he started, the State of Georgia altered its requirements for firefighter certification, requiring both hazardous materials (hazmat) awareness training and hazmat operations training.

How Long is Too Long? Inferring Causation and FMLA Retaliation Law

July 25, 2025 | Parks, Chesin & Walbert

A recent Family and Medical Leave Act dispute is a reminder of the importance of timing. In many FMLA retaliation cases, the matter may come down to whether an adequate link exists between the employee’s use of FMLA leave and the employer’s punitive action, and that existence may depend on exactly how close in time the two events occurred. If you have questions about an FMLA matter and potential retaliation issues, you should contact an experienced Atlanta FMLA retaliation lawyer to discuss your situation.

A recent retaliation case from outside Georgia serves as a reminder that gaps measuring multiple months are often too long to infer that a motive of retaliation caused the adverse employment action.

The employee in that case, L.C., was an account executive for a TV station in southern West Virginia. In February 2022, the executive gave birth to twins. However, during her C-section surgery, part of her urinary system suffered damage. This damage required a follow-up surgery, caused the executive severe pain, and limited her ability to stand, walk, and drive.

The Importance of Detailed Documentation in the Medical Certification Portion of the FMLA Leave Request Process

June 30, 2025 | Parks, Chesin & Walbert

Requesting leave under the Family and Medical Leave Act might seem like a simple and straightforward thing… but that is not always the case. Employees seeking leave must submit careful, detailed requests and supporting documentation (such as doctor’s notes) that sufficiently put employers on notice that the employee has a serious medical condition requiring FMLA leave. If you have questions about your rights and obligations under the FMLA, it is wise to consult an experienced FMLA leave lawyer.

A recent FMLA retaliation case from a federal court in Florida illustrates how a request can go wrong if not done correctly.

D.N., the employee, was a billing contract coordinator for a community organization who went into early labor and delivered her child prematurely. After the child’s birth, the coordinator requested four weeks of FMLA leave, spanning from early February to early March 2023. Alongside her request, the employee presented a note from her doctor to support the request.

FMLA Retaliation and Interference Cases Against Public Employers

March 10, 2025 | Parks, Chesin & Walbert

Potential Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) violations might seem like straightforward black-and-white issues. Often, though, they are not. The FMLA contains many complex and nuanced elements. That is especially true if your FMLA matter involves an exceptional circumstance, such as when the family member requiring care is a military service member or when you work for a public employer. Whatever details and statutes your dispute implicates, your case needs — and deserves — advocacy provided by an experienced Atlanta FMLA retaliation and interference lawyer.

An FMLA case recently before the federal 11th Circuit Court of Appeals (which covers Georgia, Alabama, and Florida) examines this issue of caring for Armed Forces members and the FMLA.

The employee was a mom who worked as a program director for a public university in Alabama. In 2020, the director’s daughter endured a sexual assault at her Marine base, and the director requested FMLA leave to travel to Hawaii and care for her daughter.

What a Recent FMLA Retaliation Case Demonstrates about the Importance of Where a Dispute is Litigated

January 31, 2025 | Parks, Chesin & Walbert

Many variables may influence the eventual outcome when you decide to pursue (or need to defend) a Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) retaliation case. One that can sometimes be overlooked is where the case gets litigated. As a recent FMLA retaliation case from Oklahoma illustrates, the law is not always identical across all the federal circuits, creating variations that can make the difference between a dismissal and a case litigated all the way to trial. If you have questions about your matter (or potential case,) be sure to speak with a knowledgeable Atlanta FMLA retaliation lawyer.

Supervisor liability in an FMLA retaliation lawsuit is one of those issues where the venue of the case can make a huge difference.

Take, for example, a dispute between an IT worker at a public university, M.W.D., and the institution’s board of regents. The employee’s complaint alleged that the university fired her for taking FMLA leave, but the school contended it fired the woman for falsifying her absence reports.