Atlanta Employment Attorneys Blog

Managing the ‘McDonnell Douglas Framework’ in Your FMLA Retaliation or Federal Discrimination Lawsuit

June 23, 2025 | Parks, Chesin & Walbert

Succeeding in advancing a Family and Medical Leave Act retaliation or interference claim (or defending against such an allegation) requires many things. It demands knowing all of the elements you must prove for success, and what the law says you need to satisfy those elements. A knowledgeable and experienced Atlanta FMLA interference lawyer can be essential to achieving this successful outcome.

A recent race discrimination and FMLA interference lawsuit illustrates some of the similarities between those two federal claims, including when it comes to the proof required to win.

The employee who sued, G.L., held a managerial position in the City of Atlanta’s agency responsible for providing drinking water and managing wastewater. While the manager was out on FMLA leave, an emergency occurred when one of the agency’s plants ran out of fluoride water treatment. Although an investigation eventually revealed that a higher-ranking employee (the deputy commissioner) knew about the shortage for “several days” before G.L. found out, the employer nevertheless demoted the manager after the shortage incident.

How the FLSA’s Statute of Limitations Sunk One Employee’s Minimum Wage Violation Case

June 16, 2025 | Parks, Chesin & Walbert

A minimum wage case that recently came before the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals (whose decisions control federal lawsuits in Georgia, Florida, and Alabama) is an example of how employees with legitimate Fair Labor Standards Act claims can still lose if they proceed without counsel and get tripped up by procedural requirements such as the statute of limitations. The case and its outcome make for a noteworthy cautionary tale about the risks of proceeding without a skilled Atlanta minimum wage lawyer advocating for you and monitoring procedural deadlines like the statute of limitations.

The employee, M.M., worked at a pet store in Florida for approximately three weeks in August 2018.

According to the employee, she worked full-time as a certified veterinary technician at a salary of $35,000 per year. According to the pet store, M.M. was a part-time kennel technician.

A New U.S. Supreme Court Ruling Addresses the Litigation of Federal ‘Reverse Discrimination’ Cases Under Title VII

June 10, 2025 | Parks, Chesin & Walbert

“Reverse discrimination” is an informal phrase that refers to instances of discrimination where the target of discrimination was not a member of a historical minority group (like, for example, women, African Americans, and gays/lesbians) but rather a traditional majority group (like men, white people, and heterosexuals). Recently, the U.S. Supreme Court rejected the notion that members of majority groups should have a higher burden of proof placed on them as compared to members of minority groups. The high court’s decision reflects that federal discrimination law is evolving and will continue to change. The best way to equip yourself for success in a discrimination lawsuit is to seek out and retain an Atlanta discrimination lawyer who is deeply versed in, and entirely up to date on, all aspects of Title VII law.

The employee in the Supreme Court case, M.A., worked for an Ohio governmental agency that oversaw juvenile corrections in the state. When the agency created a new management role, she applied for it, but the role went to a different woman. Shortly thereafter, the agency demoted her to a secretarial job and chose a man to fill her vacant position.

She sued the agency for sexual orientation discrimination under federal law (Title VII). What made her case unusual was that she was heterosexual, and the successful candidates — the man who assumed the administrator role and the new manager — were gay and lesbian.

Opting In, Opting Out, and the Differences Between Federal Class Actions and FLSA Collective Actions

May 30, 2025 | Parks, Chesin & Walbert

Recently, a Greene County employer found itself facing not one but two federal lawsuits related to its pay practices and overtime compensation. The pair of filings illustrates how misclassifying workers can have numerous, complex impacts, both on the employer being sued and on employees who must decide whether to join an existing Fair Labor Standards Act collective action or pursue a separate case. When making decisions as an employee about opting in or out, or as an employer defending these lawsuits, it is wise to consult with a knowledgeable Atlanta wage and hour lawyer who can offer essential advice about how best to proceed.

The Greensboro employer, M.S.G., was a project management consulting company that employed several engineers. Several of those engineers believed that the employer had underpaid them. Specifically, the engineers contended in a federal complaint that the employer had illegally misclassified them as overtime-exempt when, in fact, they were non-exempt and should have received time-and-a-half compensation for their overtime hours, whereas they actually received only their regular pay for those hours.

One of those Georgia engineers, R.S., sued in 2023. In June 2024, the federal District Court conditionally certified the case as an FLSA collective action.

The Salary Basis Requirement Within the EAP Exception… and How Even Highly Paid Workers May Be Entitled to Time-and-a-Half Overtime

May 23, 2025 | Parks, Chesin & Walbert

The rules the Fair Labor Standards Act sets up regarding time-and-a-half overtime compensation are often nuanced and can be complicated. Employers risk noncompliance when they fall into the trap of oversimplification. For example, paying a worker a large sum every week or month does not necessarily mean that the worker is exempt from overtime compensation. To ensure your (or your employer’s) pay practices are fully compliant, you should talk to an experienced Atlanta wage and hour lawyer.

A recent unpaid overtime case that began in neighboring Tennessee is a good example of how high earnings do not always equal exempt status for employees.

The case involved a professional pipe inspector. The inspector’s employer paid him a “guaranteed weekly salary” of $800 and an additional $100 per hour for each hour over eight he worked in a given week. The employer classified the inspector as salaried and did not pay him time-and-a-half overtime. That meant the inspector, who averaged 52 hours per week, received $100 per hour for all hours (and not $150 for hours 41 and above).

What a Brief Dive into Reddit Can Teach About the FLSA and the Requirements Surrounding Employers’ Handling of Pooled Tips

May 16, 2025 | Parks, Chesin & Walbert

The Reddit platform can be a source of amusement and distraction. Occasionally, it can also provide an opportunity for education. Take, for example, a post from earlier this week centering around a pay practices problem and tipped employees. While wholly unverified, the post highlights an example of how employers can violate the law if they are not mindful of the Fair Labor Standards Act’s requirements and why they should consult an experienced Atlanta wage and hour lawyer if they have any questions about handling employees’ tips.

According to the employee, her manager sent a group text message addressed to “all employees.” The manager, “Kelly”, informed her team that the “pooled tips we’ve gotten… won’t be distributed. Janice’s mom just passed away and they could use it more than we do at the moment.”

After reading that, many might wonder, “Can they do that legally?” In short, the answer is “probably not.”

The U.S. Department of Labor Makes an Important Statement About a 2024 Rule Related to Independent Contractor Classifications

May 9, 2025 | Parks, Chesin & Walbert

The U.S. Department of Labor has made multiple noteworthy changes in the wake of the transition from President Biden to President Trump in January. The changes remind employers and employees alike of the high impact federal regulations have on wage and hour law. Employers and employees alike should be mindful of the effects of changes and the potential for more. That includes consulting a knowledgeable Atlanta wage and hour lawyer for answers to your questions about your business’s (or your employer’s business’s) compliance.

One of the newest changes took place at the beginning of this month, and it involves backing away from an independent contractor classification rule established last year.

On May 1, the DOL’s Wage and Hour Division issued a new Field Assistance Bulletin (No. 2025-1), which indicated that the department will no longer follow “the 2024 Rule’s analysis when determining employee versus independent contractor status in FLSA investigations.” Instead, according to the bulletin, the division will use an earlier test.

The FLSA’s Overtime Provisions and the ‘Motor Private Carrier’ Exemption

April 30, 2025 | Parks, Chesin & Walbert

The Fair Labor Standards Act established a broad right for workers to receive a minimum wage and overtime pay. The statute also has numerous exemptions to the right to overtime pay. While workers and employers are probably familiar with exemptions for executive, administrative, professional, computer, and outside sales employees, those are not the only ones. Identifying and understanding the breadth of all exemptions can be crucial to avoiding a FLSA violation. Talk to an experienced Atlanta wage and hour lawyer if you have any questions about FLSA exemptions or exempt versus nonexempt classifications.

In addition to the exemptions listed above, which Congress outlined in Section 13(a)(1) of the FLSA, further exemptions exist under Section 13(b)(1). Section 13(b)(1) exemptions pertain only to overtime compensation, whereas Section 13(a)(1) exemptions extend to overtime and minimum wage requirements. Examples of Section 13(b)(1) exemptions include individuals who work in the trucking, rail, and air carrier industries.

A recent unpaid overtime dispute from the federal courts focused on those Section 13(b)(1) exemptions. The employer was an entity that sold, delivered, and installed “screwpiles used in the construction of foundations.” The employees were a pair of welders. In addition to welding, welders were also responsible for “loading trailers, securing loads for transport, and inspecting trucks for safety items such as lights, tires, brakes, and horns.”

The Portal-to-Portal Act, ‘Integral and Indispensable’ Activities, and When Travel Time is Compensable Under Federal Law

April 24, 2025 | Parks, Chesin & Walbert

Employers and employees need to be aware of the requirements of the Fair Labor Standards Act. This allows workers to be sure they receive all the wages they deserve and permits employers to be confident that they are compliant with federal law. Whether you are a worker or an employer, if you have questions regarding the FLSA and related statutes (like the Portal-to-Portal Act), get reliable answers by seeking out the advice of an experienced Atlanta wage-and-hour lawyer.

One of the things the Portal-to-Portal Act requires for time to be compensable is that the activity was “integral and indispensable.” A recent unpaid overtime case from the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals provides a clear example of what it means to be “indispensable.”

The case involved the pay practices of a commercial plumbing company based in Alabama. The company had a shop in Shelby County that housed company-owned trucks, parts, and supplies. Although many plumbers stopped at the shop on their way to job sites, the employer followed a policy that employees’ compensable time started when they arrived at the job site, not when they arrived at the employer’s shop.

Worker Classification Under the FLSA and the Significance of Federal Income Tax Forms W-2 and 1099

April 16, 2025 | Parks, Chesin & Walbert

Whether you are an employer or an employee, it is essential to avoid misconceptions that can lead you down a fruitless path when it comes to the Fair Labor Standards Act. Falling victim to these can lead to mistakes regarding what sort of evidence you do need… and what won’t help. Having a knowledgeable Atlanta wage and hour lawyer on your side can be instrumental in avoiding these errors.

Today, we examine alleged worker misclassification under the FLSA and misconceptions about the significance of a worker’s income tax forms (1099 vs. W-2).

R.V. worked for a “mini casino” in Southwest Florida for five years. The casino classified R.V. as an independent contractor and, when they sent her income tax documents showing her annual earnings, they sent her a Form 1099.