Wage & Hour

How Implementing an Improper Rounding Method May Trigger a FLSA Violation

November 14, 2025 | Parks, Chesin & Walbert

Hourly employers (and employers who use hourly employees) are well acquainted with the “time clock.” Employers have an obligation to accurately record hours worked and pay workers for all time worked; otherwise, they risk violating the Fair Labor Standards Act. Employers, however, need not pay workers down to the minute. The law allows them to engage in rounding of hours so long as the rounding method is equally likely to round up as to round down. Systems that always round down deprive workers of compensation they had earned and violate the law. For questions about rounding of hours and what methods are (or are not) compliant with the FLSA, talk to an experienced Atlanta wage and hour lawyer to get the answers you need.

An example of an improper method — and the costs it can trigger — was on display earlier this year.

The Labor Department’s Wage and Hour Division announced in May that it had recovered nearly $600,000 in “back wages and damages” for more than 400 workers employed by a construction contractor in Florida.

How Pre-Trial Motions May Hold the Keys to Success in Your FLSA Lawsuit

November 7, 2025 | Parks, Chesin & Walbert

On TV, parties often win their court cases as a result of a massive revelation during trial in open court. In real life, parties often sow the seeds of their success before the trial even starts. A truck driver’s recent unpaid overtime case illustrates just how critical pre-trial motions can be in a Fair Labor Standards Act case. If you have questions about litigating your FLSA case, retain an experienced Atlanta unpaid overtime lawyer to provide the advice and advocacy you need.

The truck driver, K.S., initiated an FLSA lawsuit in 2022, alleging she worked substantial amounts of unpaid overtime. Specifically, she asserted that she worked roughly 70 hours per week but never received any overtime compensation as required by federal law.

The employer contended that federal law did not require it to pay the driver overtime compensation. Specifically, the employer argued that K.S. was an independent contractor, not an employee. The employer furthermore contended that it did not owe K.S. overtime because an exemption to the FLSA’s overtime requirement—the Motor Carrier Act Exemption—applied to its case.

Deciding Who Should (and Who Should Not) Share in an Employee Tip Pool

October 24, 2025 | Parks, Chesin & Walbert

Restaurant work is often fast-paced and can be hectic. Providing quality service to customers requires a high degree of teamwork and can demand that workers wear many “hats.” This may potentially create some gray areas when it comes to tip pools. If you have questions about who should — and should not — participate in a tip pool, you should consult with a knowledgeable Atlanta wage and hour lawyer.

One example of this comes from a letter to the Wage and Hour Division (WHD) from earlier this year. In the scenario, the business was a “quick service restaurant.” At the restaurant, employees worked on a line preparing and assembling the food the customers picked out, then the customers paid for their food at the end of the line before finding a table in the dining area. (Fast-casual Mexican establishments like Chipotle and Qdoba are examples of a similar type of quick service restaurant.)

At the restaurant, all team members received a cash wage at or above the applicable minimum wage. The restaurant nevertheless allowed customers the option to leave a tip, either on their credit cards or in a tip jar. The restaurant subsequently pooled the tips and split the pool among its employees.

How the FLSA’s Statute of Limitations Sunk One Employee’s Minimum Wage Violation Case

June 16, 2025 | Parks, Chesin & Walbert

A minimum wage case that recently came before the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals (whose decisions control federal lawsuits in Georgia, Florida, and Alabama) is an example of how employees with legitimate Fair Labor Standards Act claims can still lose if they proceed without counsel and get tripped up by procedural requirements such as the statute of limitations. The case and its outcome make for a noteworthy cautionary tale about the risks of proceeding without a skilled Atlanta minimum wage lawyer advocating for you and monitoring procedural deadlines like the statute of limitations.

The employee, M.M., worked at a pet store in Florida for approximately three weeks in August 2018.

According to the employee, she worked full-time as a certified veterinary technician at a salary of $35,000 per year. According to the pet store, M.M. was a part-time kennel technician.

The Salary Basis Requirement Within the EAP Exception… and How Even Highly Paid Workers May Be Entitled to Time-and-a-Half Overtime

May 23, 2025 | Parks, Chesin & Walbert

The rules the Fair Labor Standards Act sets up regarding time-and-a-half overtime compensation are often nuanced and can be complicated. Employers risk noncompliance when they fall into the trap of oversimplification. For example, paying a worker a large sum every week or month does not necessarily mean that the worker is exempt from overtime compensation. To ensure your (or your employer’s) pay practices are fully compliant, you should talk to an experienced Atlanta wage and hour lawyer.

A recent unpaid overtime case that began in neighboring Tennessee is a good example of how high earnings do not always equal exempt status for employees.

The case involved a professional pipe inspector. The inspector’s employer paid him a “guaranteed weekly salary” of $800 and an additional $100 per hour for each hour over eight he worked in a given week. The employer classified the inspector as salaried and did not pay him time-and-a-half overtime. That meant the inspector, who averaged 52 hours per week, received $100 per hour for all hours (and not $150 for hours 41 and above).

The U.S. Department of Labor Makes an Important Statement About a 2024 Rule Related to Independent Contractor Classifications

May 9, 2025 | Parks, Chesin & Walbert

The U.S. Department of Labor has made multiple noteworthy changes in the wake of the transition from President Biden to President Trump in January. The changes remind employers and employees alike of the high impact federal regulations have on wage and hour law. Employers and employees alike should be mindful of the effects of changes and the potential for more. That includes consulting a knowledgeable Atlanta wage and hour lawyer for answers to your questions about your business’s (or your employer’s business’s) compliance.

One of the newest changes took place at the beginning of this month, and it involves backing away from an independent contractor classification rule established last year.

On May 1, the DOL’s Wage and Hour Division issued a new Field Assistance Bulletin (No. 2025-1), which indicated that the department will no longer follow “the 2024 Rule’s analysis when determining employee versus independent contractor status in FLSA investigations.” Instead, according to the bulletin, the division will use an earlier test.

‘Donning’ and ‘Doffing,’ Reasonable Time Versus Actual Time, and What It Takes for Pay Practices to Comply with the FLSA

February 28, 2025 | Parks, Chesin & Walbert

One of the more thorny Fair Labor Standards Act issues for employers is ensuring proper compensation of employees who spend time doing activities that are essential but tangential to their jobs. Even if workers spend only minutes each day on these activities, the law says they are entitled to payment for that time, so employers should ensure that they are recording and compensating this time appropriately. Given how complicated this can be, consulting an experienced Atlanta wage and hour lawyer is vital to ensuring that your pay practices comply with the law.

Previously, this blog published posts, including one earlier this month, about questions surrounding the proper compensation of office workers for the time they spent starting up and shutting down their computers (and various applications necessary for their work.) Another area of industry where pre-shift/post-shift tasks may present pay problems is manufacturing, specifically, manufacturing workers who must put on and take off essential personal protective equipment (PPE) at the beginning and end of each shift.

In December, a federal appeals court in Philadelphia addressed this issue of pre-shift/post-shift duties. The defendant was an employer that operated a battery manufacturing and recycling facility. The employer required certain workers at the plant to wear special uniform clothing, safety glasses, hard hats, and other PPE. Some workers also had to shower at the end of each shift.

Georgia Call Center Employees Seek Compensation for Time Spent Booting Up and Shutting Down Their Work Computers

February 14, 2025 | Parks, Chesin & Walbert

New technologies affect all aspects of our work lives. Workers who once wrote their clock-in and clock-out times on paper cards eventually began “punching” in and out using automated machines. Later, they clocked in and out on special electronic timekeeping machines, and eventually, timekeeping became a computerized function. With each evolution, keeping an accurate record of employees’ time worked has presented challenges. However, at each step, the law places the onus on the employer to ensure that its timekeeping records are accurate and that all employees are paid for all the hours they worked. If you believe your employer has illegally underpaid you — or you are an employer concerned about unpaid hours compliance issues — an experienced Atlanta wage and hour lawyer can provide you with essential information and advice.

Just to our south, in Macon, significant legal action is unfolding regarding timekeeping accuracy and unpaid hours in violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act.

The facts underlying the representatives’ claims are similar to those asserted in previous lawsuits in other jurisdictions. The representatives, who worked in the insurer’s call center in Macon, were required to log into a software application to take customer calls and log out of the application at the end of each shift. The application tracked the time each representative was logged in, and the employer paid representatives based on that timer.

The U.S. Supreme Court Clarifies the Standard of Proof for FLSA Exemption Disputes

January 24, 2025 | Parks, Chesin & Walbert

When you pursue or defend an unpaid overtime case under the Fair Labor Standards Act, there are a lot of variables and uncertainties. One thing that is certain, in the wake of a recent U.S. Supreme Court ruling, is the standard of proof that applies when the dispute centers around exempt-versus-nonexempt classifications. Even with the court deeming that the less-rigorous burden applied, employers should be aware that proving the applicability of an exemption still requires substantial evidence and deep knowledge of the law. Ensuring you have the right Atlanta wage and hour lawyer on your side can make all the difference in clearing this evidentiary hurdle.

The recent Supreme Court case began in a Maryland federal court. A group of sales representatives sued their employer for unpaid overtime. The employer contended that it owed the representatives no overtime because they were exempt employees. (Specifically, the employer deemed the representatives covered by the FLSA’s “outside salesman” exemption.)

The trial court ruled in favor of the employees, concluding that the employer failed to show “by clear and convincing evidence” that the exemption applied. The 4th Circuit Court of Appeals upheld that decision.

Determining Overtime Compensation for Employees Who Work in Multiple Locations

January 17, 2025 | Parks, Chesin & Walbert

Some employees work at the same location, performing the same role every day. A lot of workers, however, do not. They may work for their employer in multiple locations and perform various roles. Employees in this latter category may be at an exceptionally high risk of suffering the harm of unpaid overtime compensation. When you work in different locations or perform different roles, it may be easier for your employer to fail to credit you for all your hours during a workweek and fail to pay overtime even though your total hours exceed 40. If you believe that your employer has illegally underpaid you in this (or any) manner, you owe it to yourself to contact an experienced Atlanta wage and hour lawyer and discuss your circumstances.

Last month, the U.S. Department of Labor’s Wage and Hour Division (WHD) recovered more than $145,000 in unpaid overtime compensation in a case that involved employees whose workweeks included duties at multiple locations.

After an investigation, the division concluded that the employer, which owned three Choice Hotels establishments in Helen, Georgia, engaged in misconduct that wrongfully denied overtime pay to nearly 100 of its housekeeping and front desk employees.